Transparency
AI Use & Limitations
Qami AI Teams uses AI for limited parts of the assessment flow. This page explains where AI is used, what data is involved, and where human judgment still matters.
Last updated: April 5, 2026
Where AI is used
Objective questions are scored without AI. Open-ended responses are evaluated after final submission against authored rubrics and grading rules. That AI-assisted evaluation contributes to the final assessment results shown in the platform.
Where AI is not used
AI does not replace authored answer keys for objective questions. It does not override the scoring boundaries set by the platform. It should not be treated as an autonomous decision-maker for employment or workplace actions.
What data is processed
When open-ended answers are evaluated, submitted response text and the rubric context needed for scoring may be processed by third-party AI providers. We use that processing to classify and score open-ended answers inside the assessment workflow.
Known limitations
- AI output may be incomplete, incorrect, or overly confident.
- Similar answers may not always receive identical language in the explanation or summary.
- AI-assisted scoring should be reviewed in context, especially before any coaching, policy, or people decision.
Human review remains required
Assessment results are decision-support, not final truth. Customers are responsible for how they interpret scores, what follow-up they assign, and whether separate human review is applied before any employment or operational decision.
Customer responsibilities
Do not submit regulated, highly sensitive, or confidential information unless your organization has approved that use. You are responsible for the data entered into the system and for using AI-assisted outputs in a lawful and appropriate way.
Related policies
For details on data handling, see the Privacy Policy. For platform access and usage rules, see the Terms of Service.
Contact
Questions about AI use in the service can be sent to support@qamiai.com.